Comics Alliance has an excellent piece up right now, The 15 Worst Comics of the Decade. I have to say, I agree with almost all of it (93.3%, in fact). It’s well-written, and the Jemas years at Marvel are given their appropriate due.
The one book on the list I take issue with, though, is John Parker’s review of Image United, especially since only one issue has come out so far. It’s no secret that I’ve been enamored with this book, but I think there are too many pre-suppositions to make this a fair and objective review. The only people looking forward to this book are men in their 30′s who still read superhero comics? Like the writers of this piece? (And yes, me.)
Considering I haven’t read books by most of the Image Founders (Liefeld excluded) in 10+ years, I’m surprised that I’m playing the Image apologist, but just like you can’t blame a Terminator movie for not having enough character moments, you can’t blame an Image jam book for having 6 different art styles and a bunch of splash pages. You pay your $4, take in the spectacle, and hope you get a fun ride. So far Image United looks to be doing better than Terminator Salvation.
Sure, it’s not Art (though the art IS purty), but it is pop mayhem, and there’s a place in comics for that, too. I don’t care about Dennis the Menace, but Fantagraphics is putting out collections like they’re illuminated manuscripts. And that’s okay. What’s the harm in looking back, and why is it different for Image than for Hank Ketchum or Ernie Bushmiller?
Sure, Robert Kirkman is basically just there to set scenes, put words in mouths, and get out of the way. And yes, sometimes styles clash (especially Larsen’s). But that’s the whole point of this book.
It is obvious to see how self indulgent Image was back then. And some of that definitely applies now, but I still maintain that this is a decent, readable comic. I’m not completely blinded by my love of the past, because I paid good money for the recent Youngblood hardcover with the all-new coloring and Joe Casey script. Casey even reordered pages to make a coherent plot out of the thing and it was still a mess.
Every single one of Parker’s points is valid. And I’m willing to be completely wrong about every point I’ve made. I just think there are better choices for a “worst of” list than a book that’s only seen one issue. Every other story had a chance to wrap up, I’m just saying let’s wait the 3 years for issue 6 to come out and evaluate it then.